- Fall Conference
- Northern Lights
Thank you for volunteering to judge the Minnesota Association of Government Communicators annual Northern Lights Contest. We greatly appreciate your willingness to share your time and expertise.
Process and Timeline
Judges will receive the entries to judge on or about March 12, 2018. Scores and detailed comments are due by the end of the day April 6.
Each entry will be judged by at least two people. Our goal is to have three or more judges per entry.
After the judging deadline, MAGC will tabulate and average the scores submitted by the judges. Judges will be notified of the results for their category after tabulation is complete and should immediately notify the Northern Lights committee of any concerns they may have with the reported results.
CONTEST RESULTS ARE CONFIDENTIAL DATA UNTIL AFTER THE AWARDS CEREMONY. Under no circumstances should judges share or comment on the results with anyone other than their fellow category judges and the designated judging representatives on the Northern Light Committee. Please help us keep the awards a surprise!
How to Judge an Entry
Judges must submit individual scores and comments for each of the entries they are judging via an online form. A link to this form will be provided to judges.
20% of the total score will be based on the clarity and completeness of the information provided on the contest entry form. The remaining 80% will be based on the quality of the project itself.
Judges, please read all of your category's entry forms in their entirety before beginning to judge the entries. In evaluating each entry, take into account:
Your scores will be combined with the scores submitted by the other judges in your category. The average score will determine the outcome of the contest. An explanation of the standard competition ranking system used in the contest can be found in the Contest Rules.
... and Provide Detailed Comments
Many participants enter the Northern Lights Contest because of the excellent quality of the feedback our judges are known to give. We ask that you build on the good work done by past judges.
Please provide detailed comments wherever requested on the judging form, and be as specific as possible. Comments should touch on the entry's strengths and should also include suggestions for improvement. Remember that your feedback is greatly valued by contest participants.
Best of Show Nominations
Best of Show nominations represent the best in government communications from the past year.
The MAGC board or its designees will select a single Best of Show winner from the nominated entries. No person with a conflict of interest may participate in the Best of Show selection process.
Conferring With Other Judges
Some judges find value in meeting with the other judges for their category, by phone or in person, to discuss and compare impressions of the entries before assigning scores. Other judges prefer the convenience of scoring the entries and writing their comments individually.
Conflicts of Interest
Judges must recuse themselves if asked to judge a category in which they have a conflict of interest. For example, it is a conflict of interest when a judge scores an entry that is from an organization employing the judge or an organization contracting services from the judge.