Print Page | Sign In | Register
Contest Rules

Carefully read and understand the following rules before submitting contest entries.

If you have questions on how to prepare an entry, contact info@magconline.org. Contest managers and judges will have the discretion of disqualifying entries if applications are incomplete or are inconsistent with the contest rules.

Submitting an Entry

All entrants are required to complete the online entry form. 

This year, all entries will be submitted electronically. This means you'll need to upload electronic files and/or submit URLs that lead to your entries.

Cost per entry

  • $75 for MAGC and MACTA members.
  • $100 for nonmembers.
  • There is no discount for multiple entries.

If you choose to pay by credit card, a 2% merchant fee will be assessed.

If you choose to pay by invoice, submit your entries early enough to ensure your payment will reach MAGC by the contest deadline of March 2 at 8 p.m. Unpaid entries run the risk of disqualification.

  • Tip: You can submit your entries weeks ahead of the deadline in order to receive an invoice early in the process. You'll be able to continue editing your entries until 8 p.m. March 2. Have questions, or need assistance? Contact info@magconline.org.

Choose the category or categories for your entries carefully. Each entry will be judged in the category in which it was submitted. Entries will not be moved into other categories, regardless of whether judges think they might fit better in that category. 

Refer to the contest categories list for this year's categories.

General Rules

Eligibility

The Northern Lights Awards competition is open to communicators in the public sector (including federal, state, regional and local government agencies; nonprofit agencies and school districts) and to producers in the private sector who have completed work for Minnesota nonprofit or government communicators.

Projects completed or published between January 1, 2017 and February 28, 2018 are eligible for this year's contest.

You do not need to be a MAGC member to enter the contest.

Deadline

The contest deadline for 2018 is Friday, March 2, 2018 at 8 p.m.

Use and Publication of Entries

MAGC reserves the right to use and/or refer to Northern Lights Awards contest submissions in its communications and publications on all media platforms in all publication realms. Examples of areas in which MAGC may use contest entries are:

  • As examples of entries in that category.
  • On the MAGC website as examples of outstanding work by its members.
  • At workshops, seminars, the MAGC Fall Conference, etc.  
  • On display at the Northern Lights Awards contest ceremony, to show examples of award winners.
  • In future promotions of MAGC and the Northern Lights Awards contest.
  • In other areas of publication at the discretion of the MAGC board and its volunteers.

Faulty URLs in Entries

It is the responsibility of the entrant to ensure that all URLs submitted as part of the entry are working and active from the date of entry submission through the end of May. An entry whose link URL does not provide proper access to the expected asset may be taken out of consideration for an award during the judging process.

Trophy Corrections

MAGC will purchase a corrected trophy upon request, at no cost to a contest entrant, if the trophy contains an error committed by MAGC.

The contest entrant may purchase a corrected trophy at their own expense if the text of a trophy matches the information provided by the entrant on the contest entry form.

No Refund Policy

Entry fees are non-refundable. MAGC reserves the right to refuse a refund in the case of:

  • an incomplete entry
  • an entry with one or more components submitted after the deadline for entries
  • an entry with faulty or incorrect information including one or more faulty URLs
  • an entry that has been rejected due to other shortcomings identified by the contest organizers
  •  any other situation that MAGC, in its sole determination, deems to be a sufficient reason to refuse a refund. 

Determination of Awards 

Each judge gives each entry a score of 0 - 100. No entry receiving a final score of 70 or lower is eligible for any award, regardless of ranking.

Northern Lights, Silver and Bronze awards: The entry's final score is the average of the scores from all of its judges. Entries are then ranked using standard competition ranking (see below) to determine which entries receive an award. 

Awards of Excellence: The Award of Excellence honors entries receiving a sufficiently high score (cutoff score TBD for 2018) that do not receive a Northern Lights, Silver or Bronze award. Zero, one or multiple Awards of Excellence may be given out in any category depending on how many entries score 85 or higher.

Best of Show: The MAGC board or its designees select a single Best of Show winner from the nominated entries. No person with a conflict of interest (see below) may participate in the Best of Show selection process.

Nominations for Best of Show are made by the contest's judges. Each judge may nominate one entry for Best of Show. Judges are not required to nominate any entry for Best of Show. A nomination for Best of Show will only be considered if the entry also receives a Northern Lights Award based on the combined scores of all the judges for that category.

Communicator of the Year Award and Lifetime Achievement Award: Awardees are chosen by the MAGC board or its designees. These awards are not necessarily awarded each year. See Special Achievement Awards for more information about these awards. 

Standard Competition Ranking

Standard competition ranking is used to determine which awards are granted in each category. This ranking system may be familiar to you due to its use in many athletic competitions including the Olympics.

Under this system, the award for each entry is determined by the number of entries scoring higher than it. This means that first place is granted to an entry if no other entry has scored higher than it; second place is awarded to an entry if one entry has scored higher than it; and third place is awarded to an entry if two entries have scored higher than it.

Here are some examples to show how standard competition ranking handles tie scores.

There is a tie for high score. 

  • 1-1-3. Two first-place awards are granted. The next entry receives a third-place award because there are two entries (the two tying for first place) that scored higher.

There is a single high score and a tie for second-highest score.

  • 1-2-2. A first-place award is granted, and two second-place awards are granted. The next-ranked entry does not receive a third-place award because there are three entries (the ones receiving the awards) that scored higher.

There is a tie score for third place.

  • 1-2-3-3. One first-place award, one second-place award, and two third-place awards are granted. Each entry involved in the tie receives a third-place award because there are two entries that scored higher.

To everyone's surprise, two entries tie for highest score, and three entries tie for the next-highest score. 

  • 1-1-3-3-3. Two first-place awards are granted. Each entry involved in the second tie receives a third-place award because there are two entries that scored higher.

To our universal amazement, four entries tie for highest score. 

  • 1-1-1-1. Four first-place awards are granted. No other ranked awards are granted. 

Rules Regarding Judges

Conflicts of Interest

Judges must recuse themselves if asked to judge a category in which they have a conflict of interest. For example, it is a conflict of interest when a judge scores an entry that is from an organization employing the judge or an organization contracting services from the judge.

Anonymity of Judges

MAGC does not disclose the names of the judges who provide scores and comments for a specific entry. A list of all judges may be included in the awards program.